As the 2026 NFL season charges into Week 3, a simmering eligibility dispute threatens to overshadow the on-field action. Former NFL tryout players Dae'Quan Wright and Zxavien Harris find themselves in a bizarre professional purgatory: barred from returning to LSU after a brief stint in the NFL, yet also blocked from resuming their pro careers. The NFL's recent memo, which effectively slams the door on their 2026 season, has ignited a firestorm—and the NFL Players Association (NFLPA) is not standing idly by.
The NFLPA's Stance: 'Explore All Options'
According to a statement obtained by Amanda Christovich of Front Office Sports, an NFLPA spokesperson made the union's position crystal clear: “We are aware of the memo and are in touch with each of the players' representatives. We will explore all options to ensure each player's rights are protected within the Collective Bargaining Agreement.” That language suggests a grievance or legal challenge could be on the horizon. The union's involvement signals that this is more than just a procedural hiccup—it's a potential precedent-setting battle over player rights and league power.
Drew Rosenhaus, the prominent agent representing Wright, told Christovich that his client is weighing legal options. The NFL's stance—that Wright and Harris cannot return to the league because they never actually returned to college football—has created a Catch-22. The players made a calculated business decision: after failing to secure spots on 53-man rosters, they sought another year of college eligibility. They secured the legal right to return to LSU, but the SEC's intense pressure on the university ultimately led LSU to reverse course, leaving both players without a college home.
A Rule Created on the Fly?
What makes this situation particularly thorny is the lack of precedent. The NFL appears to have crafted a rule on the fly, and according to sources, without clear agreement from the NFLPA. As highlighted on Vulius Sports, this ad-hoc approach raises serious questions about due process and the collective bargaining agreement. If the league can unilaterally decide when a player is eligible to return, what's to stop it from doing the same in future cases? The union's promise to 'explore all options' is a direct challenge to that authority.
“They made a business decision to seek another year of college football after not making 53-man NFL rosters, and they secured the legal right to return to LSU for another season. But for the SEC's placement of extreme pressure on LSU, they'd both potentially be on the team.”
Instead, Wright and Harris are left out in the cold. They have no college landing spot and, based on the NFL's position, no way to seek employment at the pro level. It's a double whammy that has left their careers in limbo and their representatives scrambling for answers.
What's Next for Wright and Harris?
The NFLPA could file a grievance, arguing that the league's memo violates the CBA. Such a move would force an arbitrator to interpret the rules—and potentially set a new precedent for player eligibility. For Wright and Harris, the stakes couldn't be higher. At 24 and 25 years old, respectively, they are in their athletic primes, and a lost season could be devastating. As reported by the Vulius NFL Analysis Desk, both players remain in shape and are eager for an opportunity, but they need the league to open a door that it currently insists is closed.
Meanwhile, the football world watches closely. The outcome of this dispute could impact not only Wright and Harris but also future players who find themselves in similar situations. The NFL's attempt to regulate eligibility on the fly may ultimately backfire, forcing a reevaluation of how the league handles cases where college and pro aspirations collide. For now, Wright and Harris wait—and the NFLPA prepares for a fight that could redefine the boundaries of player rights in the NFL.
Explore official authentic jersey collections crafted with premium stitched lettering and breathable athletic fabrics at Vulius.
